Mobile Style
Just back from the Mobile Style seminar at Tekniska Museet. As the full program suggests, it was about the similarities and differences of the mobile environments, technical and business-wise, in Sweden and Japan. More than yet-another comparison between i-mode/FOMA (Japanese 2.5G and 3G) and GPRS/UMTS (Europe's 2.5G and 3G), it was refreshing to look at the how the services have overcome the inherent limitations of the devices and the network(s) they're on. As noted by Johan Hjelm, being able to design, package, brand and sell services despite the limited bandwidth, the small screen, the awkward input methods and the relatively expensive usage accounts for a lot for the success and failure in the mobile world.
In other words, i-mode succeeded where WAP miserably failed because it didn't try to bring the whole Internet on your phone from the start. It much more humhbly started by providing no-nonsense access to specific and sanctionned information. Being able to download ringtones and get trains timetables may sound a bit simplistic by today's standards, but NTT DoCoMo (a spin-off of the former state-owned telco and the initiator of mobile web services through i-mode) did this brillantly, by carefully juggling with tight control and openness (standard technical protocols, three-tier revenue sharing, as explained in further details in my report on i-mode). Which accustomed mobile subscribers to become active users of mobile services, and in turn naturally paved the way for riskier and more advanced services (Java applications, location-based services, and the brand new contactless IC card FeliCa, to name but a few).
As Giles Richter from Mobile Content Forum pointed out, the uniqueness of the Japanese mobile "ecosystem" is that that it has evolved from inexistance to full acceptance and diffusion in an extremely short period of time. It has thus set the ground for hardware manufacturers, operators and service providers to smoothly make the transition to 3G, as opposed to most parts of Europe, where it remains uncoordinated, expensive, and limited, if not completely hypothetical.










Recent Comments